Book Review: The Berlin Wall and the Intra-German border 1961-89

Pretty self-explanatory

For those who were born after 1990 in some country other than Germany, or have completely blocked this period of time out of their heads, in the wake of the end of the Second World War, Germany, as well as its capital of Berlin, was divided up among the 4 major victorious powers-the US, UK, France and the former USSR- with each nation responsible for administrating its own sector. However, despite the arrangement originally meant to be temporary, as Cold War hostilities commenced over ideological differences between capitalism and communism, Germany soon found itself to be split into two separate countries-the pro-Western Federal Republic of Germany (aka West Germany, or Bundesrepublik Deutschland), and the communist German Democratic Republic (East Germany, or Deutsche Demokratische Republik). Berlin, similarly, found itself split into East Berlin and West Berlin, with both halves developing in their own distinct manner. 

While both Germanies became considerably well-off in their own ways throughout their existences, the severe tightening of freedoms, comparatively less economic choices, and the ever-omnipresent presence of the secret police( in this case, the infamous Stasi) meant that many living in the East were willing to take the risk to flee to the economically richer West, despite travel being severely restricted due to tense relations. As time went on, however, the outflow of refugees became problematic, as many of these were sorely-needed intellectuals and medical professionals, and it became necessary for the East German government to enact procedures to make sure its citizens stayed inside its own territory. This was where both the Berlin Wall and the Intra-German border, the subjects of this book, came into play.

A diagram of the border

 Throughout its relatively short length, the author, Gordon L. Rottman,  aims to examine how the fortifications of the inter-German borders were established, how they were manned, and whether they were actually effective. Digitally-rendered images of the Berlin Wall’s defences, from border posts to vehicle ditches to multiple layers of barbed wire, are all recreated in stunning detail in these diagrams and charts, serving to demonstrate to the reader the extent to which the East German government took measures to safeguard its borders. Similarly, the less-known Intra-German border is explained in just as much detail, though with much more photos than its Berlin counterpart due to its longer length. Numerous photos, as well as the author’s own analysis, serve to show the extent of division in Germany throughout the Cold War. Towns and houses were cut up, families were separated along the lines, and even beaches were patrolled by border guards to prevent any prospective defectors from having second thoughts. 

What perhaps struck me the most, while reading this book, was perhaps how much scrutiny was being placed by the East German government on keeping its citizens in. From the rather expensive Berlin Wall (and its multiple incarnations over the years as technology improved) to the sophisticated equipment utilized by East German border guards, it’s definitely surprising how fearful and paranoid East Germany was, though it can hardly be blamed when it found itself on the frontlines of the Cold War with its Western counterpart, and given the many skirmishes in Berlin, such as the Checkpoint Charlie incident of 1961. 

Thankfully, as we all know, as the USSR imploded, and various Warsaw pact countries including East Germany faced widespread unrest, the Berlin Wall was finally torn down, and the two Germanies were reunited in 1990 after almost 50 years. At the same time, the Intra-German border lost its use, and was similarly removed by former East German soldiers contracted by the German Army. While the Wall and the border don’t exist anymore, remnants of their legacy remain in some isolated areas, and in the minds of Germans, reflecting the enormous task of reuniting a country after half a century of division and hostility.

For a history enthusiast like me, this book should be in your collection. However, those who are just casual readers and don’t have that strong of a grasp of politics may find themselves overwhelmed by the swath of technical detail and the many confusing terms (the book chooses to use German terms where applicable.) So while I can’t really recommend this to everyone, you are free to pick this book up if you’re interested.

TL;DR:

The Good: Detailed diagrams and graphs, countless historical photos for reference

The Bad: Very specialised subject, lots of technical jargon

The Eh: You might want to take a crash course in German history or ask your German friends on their take of it (if they’re old enough) before reading this

Conclusion: Recommended for some, but not all.

Book Review: Legend of the Galactic Heroes, Volume 1: Dawn

Genuinely good sci-fi

I’ve always been fascinated with science-fiction since I was a small child. From reading fantastical stories of men on the moon to building massive LEGO models of TIE fighters to binge-watching Star Wars: The Clone Wars, it’s safe to say that sci-fi had a profound influence on my early childhood days. 

As I grew up, this draw towards futuristic worlds continued to linger one within me, and I continued to be a sci-fi superfan, with sci-fi literature and merchandise still occupying most of my room.

Star Wars, for one, had a lot of sway when it came to captivating my hunger for sci-fi. Its simple yet rich story, likeable characters, fun technology and intriguing setting made up for why I liked it so much. In fact, I’m still trying to hunt down more Thrawn trilogy books from Timothy Zahn at the moment, who did quite a bit of work when it came to expanding the galaxy beyond a farmboy and a smuggler running around shooting and slicing people up while tagging a furball and a princess along. 

Don’t get me wrong, I still like Star Wars, and I do wish the franchise a bright future. But then, while searching for stuff on the Internet one day, I stumbled across something better. A lot better.

That, my friends, is the subject of this review, Legend of the Galactic Heroes.

For the uninitiated, LOGH, as I’ll call it from now on, started out as a series of 10 novels from Japanese author Yoshiki Tanaka written in the 1980s. Its claim to fame, however, lay in its anime adaptation of the same name of the 1990s, spanning across more than 100 episodes and quite a few movies, becoming one of the longest anime to date. 

A poster for one of the many movies encompassing the anime, featuring some of the main characters

As obscure as it is, both the anime and the novels have been critically acclaimed by almost everyone who has seen it since its release. The novel series, for instance, won the Seiun awards in 1988 (basically the Japanese Hugo awards), while the anime consistently ranks as one of the best in polls made even 20 years after the series ended. If you don’t believe me, search LOGH up, and you’ll find yourself gawking at the abnormally high ratings given by the anime fandom. Yes, it’s that good.

Unfortunately, due to the extreme length of the anime, the series remained obscure to the Western world, that is, until 2016, when Viz Media started to translate the novels into English for the first time. They originally said they would only be translating the first three novels, but given how they’re now at number 8, I’d assume that the books are selling like hot cakes. Also, there’s a new anime adaptation going on at the moment, Die Neue These, which considerably picks up the pace of the story, though at the expense of some of the plot.

…Yeah

So, with all the history out of the way, let’s dive into the review itself.

Set nearly 1000 years into the future, where mankind has colonised and moved to countless planets in space, the novel kicks off by dividing the known galaxy into two factions-the tyrannical, autocratic, but strong Galactic Empire, and the democratic, yet corrupt, Free Planets Alliance. Both have hated each other with fervour since they sprouted up, but given the exhaustive resources it would take to invade each other, they have been in a stalemate for 150 years, with the exception of tiny border skirmishes. Oh, and there’s also a third faction, Phezzan, which is basically the galactic equivalent of Switzerland, where everyone stores their money and people profit off of their neutrality.

The previously-mentioned stalemate, however, is quickly broken when two men on opposing sides quickly climb through their respective ranks. On the imperial side, we have Reinhard von Lohengramm, a ‘young brat’, as his admirals call him, a cunning military strategist and political idealist with a tendency to obliterate every fleet that stands before him. On the FPA, meanwhile, we have Yang Wen-li, a mildly older, but comparatively young (he’s only 30), tactician and strategist, with a strikingly calm and laid-back demeanor. On the surface, the two seem to have similar traits and abilities, but when one looks closer, they can’t be any more different. While Reinhard wishes to overthrow the current dynasty and become emperor himself, ushering in a new era of benevolent tyranny and creating a better world for his sister to live in, Yang didn’t even want to join the military in the first place, wishing to get a chance to resign and become a historian. 

Reinhard the spoiled brat
Yang the reluctant hero

Over the course of the novel, we see how the two develop their political leanings and demonstrate their abilities through epic battles and tension-filled political incidents, but since this is just volume 1 of 10, they don’t exactly go full-on with their actions, rather taking time to interact with the world they inhabit and sow the seeds for the subsequent plot. Along the way, we get to see countless side characters, such as Reinhard’s childhood friend, Siegfried Kircheis, and Yang’s adopted ward, Julian Mintz, a young war orphan, that aid or impede the main characters’ actions.

Kircheis and his blood-red hair

As you read this review, you might be wondering how this is better than other sci-fi properties, like Star Wars. Let me put it this way. In Star Wars, you get rather black and white factions, in the form of the evil Empire and the heroic Rebel Alliance. In LOGH, however, the situation is a lot more muted, and it’s a lot more grey-on-grey than one might expect it to be. Almost every character on either side is worth sympathising with, having their own understandable goals and thought processes, and if anything, both forms of government are depicted in equal light.

The comparison between democracy and autocracy is a strong theme, and will continue to prevail throughout the series as a whole. Through the eyes of the characters, we get to see how there is no perfect form of government. An autocracy would restrict one’s freedoms, but in the right hands, could lead to a strong and powerful country. A democracy, meanwhile, would grant everyone freedom, yet allow for mass abuse of power and corruption, with the massive discord in opinions resulting in not much being done while the people suffer. It’s subtle comparisons like these that really draw me into the story, and compel me to keep on reading. Add into the mix unrivalled technical detail (Mao, Jesus and Genghis Khan are all mentioned as hailing from the distant past), and blatantly obvious historical parallels between the plot and 19th century warfare, and you get something truly intellectual yet enjoyable at the same time.

Granted, the breadth of the content we’re talking about in this book might not interest everyone, and admittedly, the pace can drag on a lot if it wanted to. You might even get lost in the sea of characters bombarding you. But if you find yourself enjoying Star Wars, and want something better, check this series out. This is just volume one, and things only get better from here.

TL;DR:

The Good: Unrivalled technical detail, intriguing setting, fascinating characterisations, interesting (and intellectual) comparison of politics, wonderfully crafted story

The Bad: The pacing can get out of hand

The ‘Eh’: The equivalent of an army of characters can get confusing at first, historical references might fly over your head, and it can get very long

Conclusion: Highly recommended to everyone. If you can’t stand reading, watch the anime. You won’t be disappointed.

BTW, Here’s the intro to the new anime adaptation for those who are interested:

The Good, the Bad and the ‘Eh’

I was going to get cracking on writing some reviews, but before I start, it’s probably best for me to explain how I’ll be grading things in my reviews.

So I’ll start off by writing a chunk of text full of words and pictures explaining ‘A’ to ‘B’ to ‘C’, and then I’ll do a quick summary of my review at the end.

That’s where the ‘Good Bad Eh’ system comes in.

Basically, the ‘Good’ is what I find good(ditto) about the object in question, while the ‘Bad’ is what I find absolutely hideous and atrocious. The ‘Eh,’ however, has a lot more leeway when it comes to its definition.

Aspects that I find ‘eh’ tend to be there for certain reasons. It could be that I find them to be neither good nor bad, but just okay. Or, it could be aspects I might have liked, but you probably wouldn’t. Take the prequels for example. Let’s say that if I found Jar Jar Binks’ performance to be fine (I don’t), but the entire Western world wanted to banish him to Siberia, then I’d put Jar Jar in the ‘Eh.’

That pretty much sums up my grading system. So, onto review number 1…

First Impressions ( I guess)

For Starters…

Ignore the ‘music’ in the domain name of this site. I put it there, because I didn’t want to pay for what is essentially just a site I made for fun.

Ok, with that out of the way, let me explain what I’m going to be doing for the rest of this site’s existence. 

As the term ‘layman’ might suggest, I’m just your average human being, utilising the Internet to its full potential to review, rant and share stuff. 

So what am I going to be reviewing/ sharing?

Good question. I’ve got plenty to share about.

What I’ll actually be doing

So, for those who don’t know me (essentially everyone), I’m a sci-fi and history nut. And I still enjoy collecting toys despite the fact that I haven’t been a child for quite some time. And that’s probably what I’ll be doing.

Throughout the course of this blog, I’ll be sharing with you all some opinions I have on tidbits of pop culture every now and then. 

For those of you who wish to know what sort of pop culture I’ll be ranting about, see the image(s) below for reference. (I’m indecisive)

Ok, this probably isn’t the best indicator of what I’m about to talk about (not that I don’t like the prequels). I’ll be needing another pic…
Hmm… seems like a good fit. But I’ll be needing something else…
Yeah ok, why not? Something’s missing though…
Ah, now we’re fine

So there you have it. I’ll be babbling about books, films and (potentially) model kits and memes whenever I feel like doing so. 

Keep in mind, though, that readers can’t submit review requests, mainly because my schedule is already packed and I don’t have the resources to buy/watch everything.

If you don’t find my tastes suited for you, that’s fine. I’m not forcing my opinions on you or anything. You can just go back to Youtube or whatever kids watch these days.

If you’re still here, though, welcome aboard. Hope you have fun reading my reviews.